Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Zeynep Sonmez vs Daria Shalamanova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sonmez vs Shalamanova analysis and find out who is favored!
Zeynep Sonmez vs Daria Shalamanova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sonmez 1 - 0 Shalamanova
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sonmez has won 42.56% of points on their second serve, while Shalamanova has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sonmez, in recent form, has won 56.5% of their opponent's second serve points, while Shalamanova has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.81% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sonmez has saved 50.93% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shalamanova has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sonmez has won 55.22% of matches played (W/L 37/ 30), with Shalamanova winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sonmez has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 30/ 23). Shalamanova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 54/ 36), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Sonmez has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.14% of matches (W/L 25/ 18), where as Shalamanova has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sonmez winning 1 times and Shalamanova being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sonmez winning 2 and Shalamanova winning 0. The last match between Sonmez and Shalamanova was at the W25 Sozopol, 14-10-2022, Quarterfinals, Hard with Zeynep Sonmez getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sonmez and Shalamanova have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sonmez winning 0 times and Shalamanova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sonmez winning 0, and Shalamanova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sonmez has played against opponents with an average rank of 222.64 while Shalamanova has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sonmez has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shalamanova has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sonmez has converted 51.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shalamanova has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
154
Rank
146
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
877
Rank
750
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
61% (187-122)
Career Total W/L
57% (60-45)
57% (21-16)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$90,076
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sonmez VS Shalamanova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Zeynep Sonmez | Daria Shalamanova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:0 | 1:9:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 85% (45/53) | 73% (38/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (27/45) | 45% (17/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (3/8) | 29% (4/14) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (31/52) | 43% (23/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Sonmez VS Shalamanova H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Daria Shalamanova
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Zeynep Sonmez | Daria Shalamanova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (21/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (47/44) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (429/410) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 25 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 120 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:47 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 225.89 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1694/2624) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (1024/1694) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (397/930) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (164/316) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (1188/2518) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (12/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (21/37) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (12/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (15/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (15/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 41% (22/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Zeynep Sonmez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Zeynep Sonmez
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
95)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Zeynep Sonmez
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Jana Fett
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
75%
(
67 of
89)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
30%
(
10 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
49%
(
49 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
49 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Dejana Radanovic
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Zeynep Sonmez
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Anastasiya Soboleva
64%
(
69 of
107)
1st Serve %
77%
(
62 of
81)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
32%
(
12 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
19)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
53 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Lucia Bronzetti
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julie Struplova
Player
Zeynep Sonmez
67%
(
82 of
123)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
120)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
51 of
80)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
51 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
120)
121
Total Points Won
122
|
4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Daria Shalamanova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ilay Yoruk
Player
Daria Shalamanova
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
24 of
36)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Shalamanova
Player
Sofia Subbotina
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve %
28%
(
8 of
29)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
14
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
51
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eleni Kordolaimi
Player
Daria Shalamanova
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
73%
(
27 of
37)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eleni Christofi
Player
Daria Shalamanova
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
97
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Daria Shalamanova
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Shalamanova
Player
Jimar Gerald Gonzalez
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Shalamanova
Player
Paula Arias Manjon
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve %
73%
(
60 of
82)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
53%
(
28 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
48 of
82)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Shalamanova
Player
Raquel Gonzalez Vilar
73%
(
74 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
7
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 3-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Beatris Spasova
Player
Daria Shalamanova
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
58
|
1-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Sonmez Vs Shalamanova Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Sonmez are available here and Shalamanova photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
